ON Semiconductor Corporation

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0YXG.L has a market cap of 977.48B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0YXG.L trades at $207.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0YXG.L's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0YXG.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0YXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0R2H.L has a market cap of 155.62B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0R2H.L trades at $171.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0R2H.L's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R2H.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0R2H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0JT5.L has a market cap of 116.99B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0JT5.L trades at $75.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0JT5.L's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JT5.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0JT5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0HFN.L has a market cap of 102.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0HFN.L trades at $207.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0HFN.L's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HFN.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0HFN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0JPO.L has a market cap of 92.36B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0JPO.L trades at $698.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0JPO.L's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JPO.L's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0JPO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0R1A.L has a market cap of 84.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0R1A.L trades at $103.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0R1A.L's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R1A.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0R1A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0EDE.L has a market cap of 48.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0EDE.L trades at $190.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0EDE.L's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0EDE.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0EDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0K19.L has a market cap of 27.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0K19.L trades at $54.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0K19.L's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0K19.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to 0K19.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0YAA.L has a market cap of 23.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0YAA.L trades at $792.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0YAA.L's P/E ratio is 220.27. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0YAA.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0YAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0R06.L has a market cap of 15.23B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0R06.L trades at $141.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0R06.L's P/E ratio is 70.47. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R06.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to 0R06.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0LEF.L has a market cap of 12.41B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0LEF.L trades at $77.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0LEF.L's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0LEF.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0LEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0L77.L has a market cap of 10.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0L77.L trades at $68.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0L77.L's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0L77.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0L77.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0KSJ.L has a market cap of 6.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0KSJ.L trades at $72.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0KSJ.L's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0KSJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0KSJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0QYL.L has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0QYL.L trades at $51.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0QYL.L's P/E ratio is -124.81. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QYL.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0QYL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0HYI.L has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0HYI.L trades at $99.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0HYI.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HYI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0HYI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0J9J.L has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0J9J.L trades at $100.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0J9J.L's P/E ratio is -46.90. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0J9J.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0J9J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0YU1.L has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0YU1.L trades at $54.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0YU1.L's P/E ratio is -75.47. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0YU1.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0YU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0J5H.L has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0J5H.L trades at $7.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0J5H.L's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0J5H.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0J5H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, OXIG.L has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while OXIG.L trades at $1,792.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas OXIG.L's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OXIG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to OXIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, AWE.L has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while AWE.L trades at $132.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas AWE.L's P/E ratio is -33.05. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AWE.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to AWE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0LID.L has a market cap of 888.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0LID.L trades at $19.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0LID.L's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0LID.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to 0LID.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0HGV.L has a market cap of 826.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0HGV.L trades at $14.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0HGV.L's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HGV.L's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to 0HGV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0I4Q.L has a market cap of 714.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0I4Q.L trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0I4Q.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0I4Q.L's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to 0I4Q.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0QWC.L has a market cap of 681.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0QWC.L trades at $8.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0QWC.L's P/E ratio is -98.29. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QWC.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0QWC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0Q3C.L has a market cap of 673.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0Q3C.L trades at $35.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0Q3C.L's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0Q3C.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to 0Q3C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0ROZ.L has a market cap of 653.33M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0ROZ.L trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0ROZ.L's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0ROZ.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0ROZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0Q19.L has a market cap of 485.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0Q19.L trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0Q19.L's P/E ratio is 200.97. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0Q19.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0Q19.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0NL1.L has a market cap of 365.37M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0NL1.L trades at $17.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0NL1.L's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0NL1.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0NL1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0JRR.L has a market cap of 230.14M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0JRR.L trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0JRR.L's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JRR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0JRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, IQE.L has a market cap of 91.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while IQE.L trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas IQE.L's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IQE.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to IQE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0RF1.L has a market cap of 48.52M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0RF1.L trades at $7.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0RF1.L's P/E ratio is -26.51. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RF1.L's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0RF1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, CML.L has a market cap of 40.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while CML.L trades at $255.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas CML.L's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CML.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to CML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, ENSI.L has a market cap of 32.36M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while ENSI.L trades at $33.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas ENSI.L's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENSI.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to ENSI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, NANO.L has a market cap of 24.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while NANO.L trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas NANO.L's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NANO.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to NANO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0J9O.L has a market cap of 7.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0J9O.L trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0J9O.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0J9O.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is less volatile compared to 0J9O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, SND.L has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while SND.L trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas SND.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SND.L's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to SND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.

0KC4.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KC4.L stands at 17.13B. In comparison, 0JZM.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0KC4.L is priced at $41.00, while 0JZM.L trades at $103.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KC4.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas 0JZM.L's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, 0KC4.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JZM.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KC4.L is more volatile compared to 0JZM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KC4.L.