Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. 0JZM.L Peers
See (0JZM.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
0JZM.L vs 0YXG.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0YXG.L has a market cap of 940.01B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0YXG.L trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0YXG.L's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0YXG.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0YXG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0R2H.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R2H.L has a market cap of 147.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0R2H.L trades at $162.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0R2H.L's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0R2H.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0R2H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0HFN.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HFN.L has a market cap of 97.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0HFN.L trades at $195.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0HFN.L's P/E ratio is 57.27. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0HFN.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0HFN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0JT5.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JT5.L has a market cap of 95.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0JT5.L trades at $62.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0JT5.L's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0JT5.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0JT5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0JPO.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JPO.L has a market cap of 89.85B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0JPO.L trades at $676.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0JPO.L's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0JPO.L's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0JPO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0R1A.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R1A.L has a market cap of 84.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0R1A.L trades at $103.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0R1A.L's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0R1A.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0R1A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0EDE.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0EDE.L has a market cap of 46.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0EDE.L trades at $182.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0EDE.L's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0EDE.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0EDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0K19.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K19.L has a market cap of 25.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0K19.L trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0K19.L's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0K19.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0K19.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0YAA.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0YAA.L has a market cap of 23.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0YAA.L trades at $792.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0YAA.L's P/E ratio is 220.27. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0YAA.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0YAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0KC4.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KC4.L has a market cap of 15.89B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0KC4.L trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0KC4.L's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0KC4.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0KC4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0R06.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R06.L has a market cap of 13.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0R06.L trades at $128.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0R06.L's P/E ratio is 63.53. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0R06.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0R06.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0LEF.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LEF.L has a market cap of 11.79B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0LEF.L trades at $73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0LEF.L's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0LEF.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0LEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0L77.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0L77.L has a market cap of 10.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0L77.L trades at $66.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0L77.L's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0L77.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0L77.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0KSJ.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KSJ.L has a market cap of 6.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0KSJ.L trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0KSJ.L's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0KSJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0KSJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0QYL.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QYL.L has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0QYL.L trades at $49.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0QYL.L's P/E ratio is -120.41. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0QYL.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0QYL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0HYI.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HYI.L has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0HYI.L trades at $96.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0HYI.L's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0HYI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0HYI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0J9J.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0J9J.L has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0J9J.L trades at $95.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0J9J.L's P/E ratio is -44.73. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0J9J.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0J9J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0YU1.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0YU1.L has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0YU1.L trades at $50.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0YU1.L's P/E ratio is -70.58. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0YU1.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0YU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0J5H.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0J5H.L has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0J5H.L trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0J5H.L's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0J5H.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0J5H.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs OXIG.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, OXIG.L has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while OXIG.L trades at $1,722.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas OXIG.L's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OXIG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to OXIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs AWE.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AWE.L has a market cap of 981.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while AWE.L trades at $129.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas AWE.L's P/E ratio is -32.27. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AWE.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to AWE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0LID.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LID.L has a market cap of 860.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0LID.L trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0LID.L's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0LID.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0LID.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0HGV.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HGV.L has a market cap of 765.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0HGV.L trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0HGV.L's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0HGV.L's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0HGV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0QWC.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QWC.L has a market cap of 681.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0QWC.L trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0QWC.L's P/E ratio is -98.29. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0QWC.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0QWC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0Q3C.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0Q3C.L has a market cap of 663.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0Q3C.L trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0Q3C.L's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0Q3C.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0Q3C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0Q19.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0Q19.L has a market cap of 648.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0Q19.L trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0Q19.L's P/E ratio is 216.34. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0Q19.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0Q19.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0I4Q.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0I4Q.L has a market cap of 633.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0I4Q.L trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0I4Q.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0I4Q.L's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0I4Q.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0ROZ.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0ROZ.L has a market cap of 615.47M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0ROZ.L trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0ROZ.L's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0ROZ.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0ROZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0NL1.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0NL1.L has a market cap of 353.78M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0NL1.L trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0NL1.L's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0NL1.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0NL1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0JRR.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JRR.L has a market cap of 214.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0JRR.L trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0JRR.L's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0JRR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0JRR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs IQE.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IQE.L has a market cap of 88.77M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while IQE.L trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas IQE.L's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IQE.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to IQE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs CML.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CML.L has a market cap of 40.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while CML.L trades at $255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas CML.L's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CML.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to CML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0RF1.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RF1.L has a market cap of 36.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0RF1.L trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0RF1.L's P/E ratio is -22.18. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0RF1.L's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to 0RF1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs ENSI.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ENSI.L has a market cap of 32.36M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while ENSI.L trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas ENSI.L's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ENSI.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to ENSI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs NANO.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NANO.L has a market cap of 24.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while NANO.L trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas NANO.L's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NANO.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to NANO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs 0J9O.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0J9O.L has a market cap of 7.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while 0J9O.L trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas 0J9O.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0J9O.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is less volatile compared to 0J9O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
0JZM.L vs SND.L Comparison
0JZM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SND.L has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZM.L is priced at $103.17, while SND.L trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.67, whereas SND.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0JZM.L's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SND.L's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZM.L is more volatile compared to SND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZM.L.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0YXG.L | $199.92 | -0.04% | 940.01B | 9.91 | $20.18 | +3.48% |
0R2H.L | $162.27 | +1.20% | 147.42B | 18.57 | $8.74 | +3.32% |
0HFN.L | $195.81 | +0.35% | 97.12B | 57.27 | $3.42 | +1.88% |
0JT5.L | $62.31 | -10.32% | 95.32B | 1.95 | $32.00 | +1.18% |
0JPO.L | $676.17 | -0.55% | 89.85B | 32.82 | $20.60 | +0.93% |
0R1A.L | $103.14 | N/A | 84.33B | 13.77 | $7.49 | +0.78% |
0EDE.L | $182.96 | +0.33% | 46.22B | 22.80 | $8.02 | +2.22% |
0K19.L | $47.12 | +0.40% | 25.34B | 20.76 | $2.27 | +3.75% |
0YAA.L | $792.30 | -0.38% | 23.20B | 220.27 | $3.60 | N/A |
0KC4.L | $37.65 | -1.84% | 15.89B | 11.55 | $3.26 | N/A |