The Kroger Co.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, 0LTM.L has a market cap of 2864392.99T. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while 0LTM.L trades at $23,328,714,800.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas 0LTM.L's P/E ratio is -34256556240.82. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0LTM.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is more volatile compared to 0LTM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, TSCO.L has a market cap of 25.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while TSCO.L trades at $377.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas TSCO.L's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSCO.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is less volatile compared to TSCO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, DFI.L has a market cap of 12.41B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while DFI.L trades at $4.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas DFI.L's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DFI.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is more volatile compared to DFI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, SBRY.L has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while SBRY.L trades at $276.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas SBRY.L's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBRY.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is less volatile compared to SBRY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, 0N4Y.IL has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while 0N4Y.IL trades at $38.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas 0N4Y.IL's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0N4Y.IL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is more volatile compared to 0N4Y.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, DFIJ.L has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while DFIJ.L trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas DFIJ.L's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DFIJ.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is more volatile compared to DFIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, OCDO.L has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while OCDO.L trades at $262.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas OCDO.L's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCDO.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is less volatile compared to OCDO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, GRG.L has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while GRG.L trades at $1,822.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas GRG.L's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRG.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is less volatile compared to GRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, FIVE.L has a market cap of 144.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while FIVE.L trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas FIVE.L's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FIVE.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is less volatile compared to FIVE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, FIVE.IL has a market cap of 144.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while FIVE.IL trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas FIVE.IL's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FIVE.IL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is less volatile compared to FIVE.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, CBOX.L has a market cap of 82.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while CBOX.L trades at $187.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas CBOX.L's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CBOX.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is less volatile compared to CBOX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, 0QLJ.L has a market cap of 60.03M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while 0QLJ.L trades at $750.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas 0QLJ.L's P/E ratio is 46.91. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0QLJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is more volatile compared to 0QLJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, MCLS.L has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while MCLS.L trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas MCLS.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MCLS.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is more volatile compared to MCLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, MRW.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while MRW.L trades at $286.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas MRW.L's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRW.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JS2.L is more volatile compared to MRW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JS2.L.

0JS2.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JS2.L stands at 47.49B. In comparison, OKEY.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0JS2.L is priced at $71.85, while OKEY.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JS2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.87, whereas OKEY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JS2.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OKEY.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0JS2.L has daily volatility of 0.93 and OKEY.L has daily volatility of N/A.