Aubay SA
Aubay SA 0IPY.L Peers
See (0IPY.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0IPY.L | $46.30 | +4.28% | 592.09M | 17.88 | $2.59 | +2.79% |
| 0L5N.L | $1,007.96 | -1.10% | 208.65B | 924.73 | $1.09 | N/A |
| 0Y0Y.L | $311.40 | -1.97% | 194.94B | 31.38 | $9.92 | +1.84% |
| 0JCT.L | $724.29 | +9.07% | 186.74B | 81.66 | $8.87 | +0.56% |
| 0R2Y.L | $410.61 | -0.96% | 175.00B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0VHA.L | $102.68 | -1.34% | 130.93B | 71.06 | $1.45 | N/A |
| 0HJI.L | $321.15 | -0.32% | 130.36B | 47.41 | $6.77 | +1.83% |
| 0KF5.L | $186.25 | -0.04% | 124.19B | -46.83 | -$3.98 | N/A |
| 0IP9.L | $160.15 | -0.63% | 88.79B | 62.71 | $2.55 | N/A |
| 0HS2.L | $316.80 | +0.32% | 86.50B | 118.25 | $2.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0IPY.L vs 0L5N.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0L5N.L has a market cap of 208.65B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0L5N.L trades at $1,007.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0L5N.L's P/E ratio is 924.73. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0L5N.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0L5N.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0Y0Y.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0Y0Y.L has a market cap of 194.94B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0Y0Y.L trades at $311.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0Y0Y.L's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0Y0Y.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0Y0Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0JCT.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0JCT.L has a market cap of 186.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0JCT.L trades at $724.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0JCT.L's P/E ratio is 81.66. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0JCT.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0JCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0R2Y.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0R2Y.L has a market cap of 175.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0R2Y.L trades at $410.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0R2Y.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0R2Y.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0R2Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0VHA.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0VHA.L has a market cap of 130.93B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0VHA.L trades at $102.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0VHA.L's P/E ratio is 71.06. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0VHA.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0VHA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HJI.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HJI.L has a market cap of 130.36B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HJI.L trades at $321.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HJI.L's P/E ratio is 47.41. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HJI.L's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0HJI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0KF5.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0KF5.L has a market cap of 124.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0KF5.L trades at $186.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0KF5.L's P/E ratio is -46.83. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KF5.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0KF5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0IP9.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0IP9.L has a market cap of 88.79B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0IP9.L trades at $160.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0IP9.L's P/E ratio is 62.71. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0IP9.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0IP9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HS2.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HS2.L has a market cap of 86.50B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HS2.L trades at $316.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HS2.L's P/E ratio is 118.25. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HS2.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0HS2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0IR9.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0IR9.L has a market cap of 78.91B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0IR9.L trades at $103.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0IR9.L's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0IR9.L's ROE of +2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0IR9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0LBP.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LBP.L has a market cap of 77.50B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LBP.L trades at $501.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LBP.L's P/E ratio is 78.11. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LBP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0LBP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HJF.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HJF.L has a market cap of 63.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HJF.L trades at $294.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HJF.L's P/E ratio is 133.45. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HJF.L's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0HJF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0LQO.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LQO.L has a market cap of 58.54B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LQO.L trades at $142.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LQO.L's P/E ratio is 36.92. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LQO.L's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0IPY.L has daily volatility of 3.18 and 0LQO.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0IPY.L vs 0KGE.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0KGE.L has a market cap of 55.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0KGE.L trades at $154.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0KGE.L's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KGE.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0KGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0M18.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0M18.L has a market cap of 52.65B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0M18.L trades at $243.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0M18.L's P/E ratio is -2292.74. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0M18.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0M18.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0LP3.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LP3.L has a market cap of 43.70B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LP3.L trades at $312.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LP3.L's P/E ratio is 50.65. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LP3.L's ROE of +4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0LP3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0TIQ.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0TIQ.L has a market cap of 41.84B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0TIQ.L trades at $1,719.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0TIQ.L's P/E ratio is 112.57. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0TIQ.L's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0TIQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0ILW.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0ILW.L has a market cap of 40.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0ILW.L trades at $77.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0ILW.L's P/E ratio is 52.75. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0ILW.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0ILW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0XVU.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0XVU.L has a market cap of 39.51B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0XVU.L trades at $255.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0XVU.L's P/E ratio is -95.49. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0XVU.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0XVU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0QZ5.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0QZ5.L has a market cap of 38.85B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0QZ5.L trades at $78.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0QZ5.L's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QZ5.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0LF5.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LF5.L has a market cap of 36.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LF5.L trades at $73.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LF5.L's P/E ratio is 366.18. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LF5.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0LF5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0ITV.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0ITV.L has a market cap of 33.75B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0ITV.L trades at $438.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0ITV.L's P/E ratio is 46.26. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0ITV.L's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0ITV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0A18.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0A18.L has a market cap of 33.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0A18.L trades at $148.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0A18.L's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0A18.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0A18.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0TZZ.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0TZZ.L has a market cap of 32.71B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0TZZ.L trades at $620.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0TZZ.L's P/E ratio is -456.07. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0TZZ.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0TZZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0L95.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0L95.L has a market cap of 30.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0L95.L trades at $73.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0L95.L's P/E ratio is -441.96. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0L95.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0L95.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HG3.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HG3.L has a market cap of 30.01B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HG3.L trades at $341.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HG3.L's P/E ratio is 66.26. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HG3.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0HG3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HPW.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HPW.L has a market cap of 27.96B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HPW.L trades at $238.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HPW.L's P/E ratio is 51.05. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HPW.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0HPW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0IPN.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0IPN.L has a market cap of 27.13B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0IPN.L trades at $305.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0IPN.L's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0IPN.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0IPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0LOZ.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LOZ.L has a market cap of 26.39B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LOZ.L trades at $281.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LOZ.L's P/E ratio is 39.52. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LOZ.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0LOZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0A1O.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0A1O.L has a market cap of 25.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0A1O.L trades at $64.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0A1O.L's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0A1O.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0A1O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0Y9S.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0Y9S.L has a market cap of 24.63B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0Y9S.L trades at $227.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0Y9S.L's P/E ratio is 47.15. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0Y9S.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0Y9S.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0R09.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0R09.L has a market cap of 24.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0R09.L trades at $156.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0R09.L's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0R09.L's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0R09.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0KB7.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0KB7.L has a market cap of 21.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0KB7.L trades at $124.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0KB7.L's P/E ratio is -19.53. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KB7.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0KB7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0K9O.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0K9O.L has a market cap of 21.39B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0K9O.L trades at $80.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0K9O.L's P/E ratio is -17.35. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0K9O.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0K9O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0L1G.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0L1G.L has a market cap of 19.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0L1G.L trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0L1G.L's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0L1G.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0L1G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0RDI.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0RDI.L has a market cap of 18.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0RDI.L trades at $436.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0RDI.L's P/E ratio is 66.41. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RDI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0RDI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0IW7.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0IW7.L has a market cap of 18.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0IW7.L trades at $74.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0IW7.L's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0IW7.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0IW7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0J1G.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0J1G.L has a market cap of 17.54B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0J1G.L trades at $209.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0J1G.L's P/E ratio is -115.93. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0J1G.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0J1G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0LHL.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LHL.L has a market cap of 17.40B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LHL.L trades at $113.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LHL.L's P/E ratio is -20.98. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LHL.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0LHL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0XNH.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0XNH.L has a market cap of 17.23B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0XNH.L trades at $85.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0XNH.L's P/E ratio is -189.51. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0XNH.L's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0XNH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HOT.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HOT.L has a market cap of 16.90B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HOT.L trades at $109.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HOT.L's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HOT.L's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0HOT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0KKZ.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0KKZ.L has a market cap of 15.13B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0KKZ.L trades at $185.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0KKZ.L's P/E ratio is -38.26. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KKZ.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0KKZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0JOI.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0JOI.L has a market cap of 15.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0JOI.L trades at $125.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0JOI.L's P/E ratio is 44.05. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0JOI.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0JOI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0KGH.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0KGH.L has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0KGH.L trades at $257.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0KGH.L's P/E ratio is 67.14. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KGH.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0KGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0GMG.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0GMG.L has a market cap of 13.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0GMG.L trades at $95.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0GMG.L's P/E ratio is 46.83. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0GMG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0GMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HBQ.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HBQ.L has a market cap of 11.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HBQ.L trades at $76.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HBQ.L's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HBQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0HBQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0KGS.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0KGS.L has a market cap of 8.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0KGS.L trades at $96.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0KGS.L's P/E ratio is -139.27. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KGS.L's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0KGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0SGO.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0SGO.L has a market cap of 8.10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0SGO.L trades at $28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0SGO.L's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0SGO.L's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0SGO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HDU.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HDU.L has a market cap of 8.03B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HDU.L trades at $78.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HDU.L's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HDU.L's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0HDU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0V9N.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0V9N.L has a market cap of 5.59B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0V9N.L trades at $118.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0V9N.L's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0V9N.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0V9N.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0VOU.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0VOU.L has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0VOU.L trades at $46.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0VOU.L's P/E ratio is -38.32. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0VOU.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0VOU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HP1.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HP1.L has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HP1.L trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HP1.L's P/E ratio is -97.71. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HP1.L's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0HP1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0ZC0.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0ZC0.L has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0ZC0.L trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0ZC0.L's P/E ratio is -54.39. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0ZC0.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0ZC0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0R0P.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0R0P.L has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0R0P.L trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0R0P.L's P/E ratio is -14.04. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0R0P.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0R0P.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0LVJ.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LVJ.L has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LVJ.L trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LVJ.L's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LVJ.L's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0LVJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HDD.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HDD.L has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HDD.L trades at $48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HDD.L's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HDD.L's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0HDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HC2.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HC2.L has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HC2.L trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HC2.L's P/E ratio is 63.33. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HC2.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0HC2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0I6U.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0I6U.L has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0I6U.L trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0I6U.L's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0I6U.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0I6U.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HCR.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HCR.L has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HCR.L trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HCR.L's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HCR.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0HCR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0HGM.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0HGM.L has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0HGM.L trades at $30.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0HGM.L's P/E ratio is -22.45. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HGM.L's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0HGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0V50.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0V50.L has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0V50.L trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0V50.L's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0V50.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0V50.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0LEE.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LEE.L has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LEE.L trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LEE.L's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LEE.L's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0LEE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0TMV.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0TMV.L has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0TMV.L trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0TMV.L's P/E ratio is -24.36. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0TMV.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0TMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0N66.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0N66.L has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0N66.L trades at $127.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0N66.L's P/E ratio is 52.35. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0N66.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0N66.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0RP6.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0RP6.L has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0RP6.L trades at $84.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0RP6.L's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RP6.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0RP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0RSL.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0RSL.L has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0RSL.L trades at $260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0RSL.L's P/E ratio is 108.79. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RSL.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0RSL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0RG5.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0RG5.L has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0RG5.L trades at $57.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0RG5.L's P/E ratio is 65.60. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RG5.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0RG5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0NWC.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0NWC.L has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0NWC.L trades at $198.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0NWC.L's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0NWC.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0NWC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0G1T.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0G1T.L has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0G1T.L trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0G1T.L's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0G1T.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0G1T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0GX2.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0GX2.L has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0GX2.L trades at $46.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0GX2.L's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0GX2.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0GX2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0XL5.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0XL5.L has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0XL5.L trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0XL5.L's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0XL5.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0XL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0DWL.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0DWL.L has a market cap of 947.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0DWL.L trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0DWL.L's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0DWL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0DWL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0M2Q.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0M2Q.L has a market cap of 827.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0M2Q.L trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0M2Q.L's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0M2Q.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0M2Q.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0O2W.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0O2W.L has a market cap of 596.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0O2W.L trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0O2W.L's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0O2W.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0O2W.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0N5I.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0N5I.L has a market cap of 570.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0N5I.L trades at $88.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0N5I.L's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0N5I.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0N5I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0NJB.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0NJB.L has a market cap of 533.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0NJB.L trades at $73.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0NJB.L's P/E ratio is 181.64. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0NJB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0NJB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0W19.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0W19.L has a market cap of 459.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0W19.L trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0W19.L's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0W19.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0W19.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0KUR.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0KUR.L has a market cap of 453.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0KUR.L trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0KUR.L's P/E ratio is 30.21. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KUR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0KUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0K1W.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0K1W.L has a market cap of 440.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0K1W.L trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0K1W.L's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0K1W.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0K1W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0EWR.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0EWR.L has a market cap of 382.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0EWR.L trades at $38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0EWR.L's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0EWR.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0EWR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0F2S.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0F2S.L has a market cap of 340.78M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0F2S.L trades at $71.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0F2S.L's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0F2S.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0F2S.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0MN5.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0MN5.L has a market cap of 314.68M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0MN5.L trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0MN5.L's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0MN5.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0MN5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0NCA.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0NCA.L has a market cap of 311.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0NCA.L trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0NCA.L's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0NCA.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0NCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0OQQ.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0OQQ.L has a market cap of 290.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0OQQ.L trades at $41.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0OQQ.L's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0OQQ.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0OQQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0JG5.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0JG5.L has a market cap of 238.47M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0JG5.L trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0JG5.L's P/E ratio is 72.26. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0JG5.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0JG5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0IKK.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0IKK.L has a market cap of 223.11M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0IKK.L trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0IKK.L's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0IKK.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0IKK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0RUM.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0RUM.L has a market cap of 199.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0RUM.L trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0RUM.L's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RUM.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0RUM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0IWU.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0IWU.L has a market cap of 172.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0IWU.L trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0IWU.L's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0IWU.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0IWU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0EIE.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0EIE.L has a market cap of 168.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0EIE.L trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0EIE.L's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0EIE.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0EIE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0ONY.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0ONY.L has a market cap of 126.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0ONY.L trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0ONY.L's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0ONY.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0ONY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0LP5.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LP5.L has a market cap of 77.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LP5.L trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LP5.L's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LP5.L's ROE of +50.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0LP5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0MUF.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0MUF.L has a market cap of 74.47M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0MUF.L trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0MUF.L's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0MUF.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0MUF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0K79.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0K79.L has a market cap of 50.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0K79.L trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0K79.L's P/E ratio is -22.43. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0K79.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0IPY.L has daily volatility of 3.18 and 0K79.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0IPY.L vs 0QAU.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0QAU.L has a market cap of 21.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0QAU.L trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0QAU.L's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QAU.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0QAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0KA8.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0KA8.L has a market cap of 6.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0KA8.L trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0KA8.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KA8.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0KA8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0OOJ.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0OOJ.L has a market cap of 5.51M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0OOJ.L trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0OOJ.L's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0OOJ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0IPY.L has daily volatility of 3.18 and 0OOJ.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0IPY.L vs 0LHP.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0LHP.L has a market cap of 607427.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0LHP.L trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0LHP.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LHP.L's ROE of -6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is less volatile compared to 0LHP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0JUZ.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0JUZ.L has a market cap of 586.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0JUZ.L trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0JUZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0JUZ.L's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0JUZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.
0IPY.L vs 0K6O.L Comparison
0IPY.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPY.L stands at 592.09M. In comparison, 0K6O.L has a market cap of 395.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPY.L is priced at $46.30, while 0K6O.L trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPY.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.88, whereas 0K6O.L's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 0IPY.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0K6O.L's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPY.L is more volatile compared to 0K6O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPY.L.