Akastor ASA
Akastor ASA 0IPT.L Peers
See (0IPT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0IPT.L | $11.76 | +3.16% | 3.20B | 3.61 | $3.26 | N/A |
| 0RR8.L | $38.14 | +2.17% | 37.78B | 109.58 | $0.35 | +2.30% |
| 0R23.L | $21.40 | +0.47% | 18.40B | 12.39 | $1.73 | +3.16% |
| 0K58.L | $14.54 | N/A | 5.57B | -30.29 | -$0.48 | +2.06% |
| 0LNT.L | $10.74 | +5.92% | 1.21B | 15.32 | $0.70 | +6.98% |
| HTG.L | $271.00 | +1.12% | 427.50M | -20.85 | -$0.13 | +2.82% |
| AT.L | $465.00 | +0.43% | 374.90M | 13.29 | $0.35 | +0.26% |
| GMS.L | $18.38 | +2.11% | 207.68M | 6.13 | $0.03 | N/A |
| PFC.L | $3.98 | -20.34% | 20.89M | -0.05 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| TAND.L | $18.00 | -5.56% | 13.18M | -9.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0IPT.L vs 0RR8.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, 0RR8.L has a market cap of 37.78B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while 0RR8.L trades at $38.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas 0RR8.L's P/E ratio is 109.58. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0RR8.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is less volatile compared to 0RR8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs 0R23.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, 0R23.L has a market cap of 18.40B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while 0R23.L trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas 0R23.L's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0R23.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is more volatile compared to 0R23.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs 0K58.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, 0K58.L has a market cap of 5.57B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while 0K58.L trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas 0K58.L's P/E ratio is -30.29. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0K58.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is more volatile compared to 0K58.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs 0LNT.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, 0LNT.L has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while 0LNT.L trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas 0LNT.L's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0LNT.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is more volatile compared to 0LNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs HTG.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, HTG.L has a market cap of 427.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while HTG.L trades at $271.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas HTG.L's P/E ratio is -20.85. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HTG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is less volatile compared to HTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs AT.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, AT.L has a market cap of 374.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while AT.L trades at $465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas AT.L's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AT.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is less volatile compared to AT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs GMS.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, GMS.L has a market cap of 207.68M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while GMS.L trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas GMS.L's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GMS.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is less volatile compared to GMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs PFC.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, PFC.L has a market cap of 20.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while PFC.L trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas PFC.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PFC.L's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is more volatile compared to PFC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs TAND.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, TAND.L has a market cap of 13.18M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while TAND.L trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas TAND.L's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TAND.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is less volatile compared to TAND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs PRES.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, PRES.L has a market cap of 13.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while PRES.L trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas PRES.L's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PRES.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is less volatile compared to PRES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs POS.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, POS.L has a market cap of 12.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while POS.L trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas POS.L's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to POS.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is less volatile compared to POS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs VLS.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, VLS.L has a market cap of 4.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while VLS.L trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas VLS.L's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VLS.L's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0IPT.L has daily volatility of 1.72 and VLS.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0IPT.L vs THAL.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, THAL.L has a market cap of 3.75M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while THAL.L trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas THAL.L's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to THAL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is more volatile compared to THAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs GTC.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, GTC.L has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while GTC.L trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas GTC.L's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GTC.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is less volatile compared to GTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.
0IPT.L vs NTQ.L Comparison
0IPT.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IPT.L stands at 3.20B. In comparison, NTQ.L has a market cap of 508682.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0IPT.L is priced at $11.76, while NTQ.L trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IPT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 3.61, whereas NTQ.L's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 0IPT.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NTQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IPT.L is more volatile compared to NTQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IPT.L.