China Beidahuang Industry Group Holdings Limited

0039.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0039.HK stands at 940.46M. In comparison, 3686.HK has a market cap of 538.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0039.HK is priced at $0.12, while 3686.HK trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0039.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.07, whereas 3686.HK's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, 0039.HK's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 3686.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0039.HK is more volatile compared to 3686.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0039.HK.

0039.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0039.HK stands at 940.46M. In comparison, 0974.HK has a market cap of 267.22M. Regarding current trading prices, 0039.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0974.HK trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0039.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.07, whereas 0974.HK's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, 0039.HK's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 0974.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0039.HK is more volatile compared to 0974.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0039.HK.

0039.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0039.HK stands at 940.46M. In comparison, 0831.HK has a market cap of 194.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0039.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0831.HK trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0039.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.07, whereas 0831.HK's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, 0039.HK's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 0831.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0039.HK is more volatile compared to 0831.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0039.HK.

0039.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0039.HK stands at 940.46M. In comparison, 0759.HK has a market cap of 78.61M. Regarding current trading prices, 0039.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0759.HK trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0039.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.07, whereas 0759.HK's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, 0039.HK's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 0759.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0039.HK is more volatile compared to 0759.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0039.HK.

0039.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0039.HK stands at 940.46M. In comparison, 1210.HK has a market cap of 69.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 0039.HK is priced at $0.12, while 1210.HK trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0039.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.07, whereas 1210.HK's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, 0039.HK's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 1210.HK's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0039.HK is less volatile compared to 1210.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0039.HK.

0039.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0039.HK stands at 940.46M. In comparison, 8496.HK has a market cap of 43.92M. Regarding current trading prices, 0039.HK is priced at $0.12, while 8496.HK trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0039.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.07, whereas 8496.HK's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, 0039.HK's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 8496.HK's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0039.HK is more volatile compared to 8496.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0039.HK.

0039.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0039.HK stands at 940.46M. In comparison, 8079.HK has a market cap of 11.67M. Regarding current trading prices, 0039.HK is priced at $0.12, while 8079.HK trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0039.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.07, whereas 8079.HK's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, 0039.HK's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 8079.HK's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0039.HK is more volatile compared to 8079.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0039.HK.