Lear Corporation

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check APTV-PA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while APTV trades at $74.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check APTV's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while MGA trades at $44.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MGA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while MBLY trades at $13.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MBLY's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while ALV trades at $118.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ALV's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while BWA trades at $41.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 39.02. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check BWA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while LKQ trades at $31.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check LKQ's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while MOD trades at $139.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 39.77. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MOD's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while ALSN trades at $88.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ALSN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while GNTX trades at $27.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GNTX's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while QS trades at $9.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check QS's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while DORM trades at $155.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check DORM's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while BC-PA trades at $24.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check BC-PA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check BC-PB's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while HSAI trades at $23.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2559.00. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HSAI's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while VC trades at $121.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check VC's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while GTX trades at $12.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GTX's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while GT trades at $8.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while DAN trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is 92.55. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check DAN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while PHIN trades at $55.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check PHIN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while ADNT trades at $23.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ADNT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while FOXF trades at $29.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check FOXF's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while THRM trades at $35.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check THRM's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while XPEL trades at $37.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check XPEL's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 840.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while SMP trades at $39.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SMP's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 737.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while AEVA trades at $13.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -6.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check AEVA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 735.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while PLOW trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check PLOW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 680.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while AXL trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check AXL's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GTXAP's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 552.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while ECX trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ECX's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while CPS trades at $28.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CPS's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while ALLG trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ALLG's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 493.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while MLR trades at $42.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MLR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while MNRO trades at $15.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -22.75. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MNRO's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 426.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while HLLY trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HLLY's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 394.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while SES trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SES's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 389.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HLLY-WT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 353.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while INVZ trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check INVZ's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 316.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while STRT trades at $75.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check STRT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 287.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while HYLN trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HYLN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 265.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while MPAA trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is 171.75. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPAA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MPAA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while SRI trades at $8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -7.28. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SRI's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while XL trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check XL's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while LAZR trades at $2.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check LAZR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while CAAS trades at $4.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CAAS's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while KNDI trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check KNDI's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 106M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while GGR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GGR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while LIDR trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check LIDR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 97.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while LIDRW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check LIDRW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while CVGI trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CVGI's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while WPRT trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check WPRT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 44.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while SYPR trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -17.59. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SYPR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while MKDW trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MKDW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ECXWW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while NCNC trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check NCNC's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check NCNCW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while AMV trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check AMV's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while WKSP trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check WKSP's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while INVZW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check INVZW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while SAG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SAG's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while SUP trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUP's ROE of +2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SUP's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while CREV trades at $4.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CREV's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while INEO trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check INEO's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while FRSX trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check FRSX's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while GGROW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GGROW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while UFAB trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check UFAB's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MKDWW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check WKSPW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 265.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while CREVW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CREVW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HYZNW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while HZN trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HZN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while RMO trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check RMO's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while MTOR trades at $36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MTOR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.32, while VNE trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check VNE's competition here